Case law
Early termination penalty subject to VAT?
The Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) in its judgement C-295/17 (MEO – Serviços de Comunicações e Multimédia SA) dealt with the question whether a fee received for early termination of a contract is subject to value added tax.
Regional Court opposed to tax administrator’s approach to R&D allowance
The Regional Court of Justice in Hradec Králové in judgment No. 52 Af 18/2016 dealt with a case where a tax administrator challenged a research and development (R&D) allowance claimed by a taxpayer. The court in particular opined on the moment of…
CJEU on transport: excise duty regime not relevant
The Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) in its December judgement (C-414/17) regarding Czech company AREX CZ dealt yet again with the issue of allocating transport in a chain of transactions. This time, it concerned fuel subject to excise duty and its…
New case law on offsetting
Offsetting is widely used in the business sphere to settle debts. By offsetting, a creditor’s and a debtor’s mutual debts of the same kind (usually monetary) cease to exist. The Supreme Court has recently issued two decisions bringing several…
SAC: difference between receivable’s nominal amount and purchase price may be…
According to the recent Supreme Administrative Court judgement, the difference between the nominal value of a receivable and its purchase price upon its transfer may be viewed as a factoring consideration, which is subject to value added tax.
SAC: additional tax may be assessed even if tax inspection is unlawful
Less than three month ago, we informed you about recent case law in which the Supreme Administrative Court (SAC) confirmed that tax administrator had proceeded unlawfully by not giving the taxpayer the chance to correct their error by filing an…
Super-gross tax base for benefits from third parties – the case continues
In July 2018, the Regional Court in Hradec Králové confirmed the duty to apply the “super-gross tax base” also for benefits provided to employees by third parties. The issue was now dealt with by the Supreme Administrative Court, which did not…
Tax administrator must not assess evidence put forward with bias
If a taxpayer produces evidence in tax proceedings, a tax administrator must assess such evidence both separately and in combination. If they have doubts about the evidence, they may invite the taxpayer to submit further or different evidence. They…
SC on proportionality of penalty under non-compete clause in employment contract
The Supreme Court (SC) dealt with the case of an employee bound by a non-compete clause who terminated employment with one employer and the following month began employment with a competitor. The former employer demanded that the employee pay a…
Research and development allowance for clinical studies
In a recent judgement, the Supreme Administrative Court (SAC) held that a research and development allowance had been claimed unlawfully, as the project in question had no element of novelty. The SAC dealt with the third phase of clinical research…
SAC on how to interpret double taxation treaties
If a double taxation treaty can be applied, the tax administrator may not automatically use domestic legal regulations to interpret a treaty’s individual concepts but must apply international law principles and the commentaries to the OECD’s Model…
General meeting’s consent with substantial asset transfers surrounded by dilemmas
One of the powers of the general meeting of a limited liability or joint-stock company is to give consent to transfer or pledge a business establishment or its part “that would result in a substantial change to the company’s existing structure,…