Case law
Stricter conditions for tax deductibility of expenses?
Some rulings by the Supreme Administrative Court (SAC) have surprising outcomes and de facto narrow the space for recognising expenses as tax-deductible by requiring proof that that a service was received from a specific supplier.
Interest on long-retained excess deductions liable to income tax?
Interest on long-retained excess deductions of up to 14% p.a. was first awarded to a taxable entity by the Supreme Administrative Court more than two and a half years ago. Since then, a number of administrative courts proceeded similarly and…
Defence against unlawful procedure to remove doubt may be well worth it
In its recent judgement, the Supreme Administrative Court (SAC) emphasised that the procedure to remove doubt should only serve to clarify concrete uncertainties. It is a tool to ascertain or to check, immediately and without delay, whether a tax…
Duty to identify clients and ascertain beneficial owners
According to the ruling of the Municipal Court in Prague, it is not possible to simply identify a statutory body, director or other top manager as the beneficial owner in cases of unclear ownership structures, as such persons may not be in a direct…
SAC on VAT exemption
In tax inspections, tax offices increasingly focus on VAT fraud connected with the transit of goods. What to watch out for when delivering goods to another EU member state, and how not raise the tax authority’s suspicions? The recent Supreme…
How to keep R&D expense records separate
To claim a research and development deduction in a tax return, taxpayers have to correctly assess the activities, prepare a project documentation, and properly record related expenses, separately from other costs. But what exactly does such separate…
When is a corporation not criminally liable?
At the end of last year, the Supreme Court opined on the limits of corporate criminal liability. Case law in this field has been quite sporadic. In regards to last December’s amendment to the Corporate Criminal Liability Act, any ruling that…
Consideration for transfer of technical improvement – good news on the horizon?
In the autumn of 2014, the Supreme Administrative Court’s ruling, stating that the right to carry out tax depreciation of a technical improvement cannot be transferred between tenants, stirred the tax waters considerably. The case has now returned…
Duty to call for additional tax returns not absolute
The Supreme Administrative Court (the SAC) recently had to decide under what circumstances the tax administrator is obligated to call upon taxpayers to file an additional tax return before commencing a tax inspection.
Good news for creditors and collection agencies
In December, the Court of Justice of the EU gave a special Christmas present to all creditors and collection agencies. In its decision, the court explained when legislation regulating the provision of consumer credits should (not) apply to…
The SAC: Are statutory representatives liable to VAT?
In its recent judgment (2 Afs 100/2016–29) the Supreme Administrative Court held that the performance of an office as statutory representative in a limited liability company meets the criteria of an independently performed economic activity and…
What information may the tax authority ask from your bank?
How resistant is bank secrecy against a call made by the tax authority? What questions about your account must your bank answer? Will the tax administrator learn from your bank that you use internet banking and who has disposal rights to your…