Case law
SAC: difference between receivable’s nominal amount and purchase price may be…
According to the recent Supreme Administrative Court judgement, the difference between the nominal value of a receivable and its purchase price upon its transfer may be viewed as a factoring consideration, which is subject to value added tax.
SC on proportionality of penalty under non-compete clause in employment contract
The Supreme Court (SC) dealt with the case of an employee bound by a non-compete clause who terminated employment with one employer and the following month began employment with a competitor. The former employer demanded that the employee pay a…
Tax administrator must not assess evidence put forward with bias
If a taxpayer produces evidence in tax proceedings, a tax administrator must assess such evidence both separately and in combination. If they have doubts about the evidence, they may invite the taxpayer to submit further or different evidence. They…
Super-gross tax base for benefits from third parties – the case continues
In July 2018, the Regional Court in Hradec Králové confirmed the duty to apply the “super-gross tax base” also for benefits provided to employees by third parties. The issue was now dealt with by the Supreme Administrative Court, which did not…
SAC: additional tax may be assessed even if tax inspection is unlawful
Less than three month ago, we informed you about recent case law in which the Supreme Administrative Court (SAC) confirmed that tax administrator had proceeded unlawfully by not giving the taxpayer the chance to correct their error by filing an…
Research and development allowance for clinical studies
In a recent judgement, the Supreme Administrative Court (SAC) held that a research and development allowance had been claimed unlawfully, as the project in question had no element of novelty. The SAC dealt with the third phase of clinical research…
SAC on how to interpret double taxation treaties
If a double taxation treaty can be applied, the tax administrator may not automatically use domestic legal regulations to interpret a treaty’s individual concepts but must apply international law principles and the commentaries to the OECD’s Model…
General meeting’s consent with substantial asset transfers surrounded by dilemmas
One of the powers of the general meeting of a limited liability or joint-stock company is to give consent to transfer or pledge a business establishment or its part “that would result in a substantial change to the company’s existing structure,…
CJEU: entitlement to claim VAT deduction for failed investments
The Court of Justice of the EU dealt with this question in the Ryanair case. In October 2018, the court held that there is an entitlement to reclaim VAT for costs (expenditures) connected with a planned acquisition that eventually did not come about…
Do you have a subsidiary? Beware of indirect shareholding costs
Taxpayers have two options in treating the indirect costs of holding a share in a subsidiary: either to prove their actual amount, or to apply a legal simplification and exclude an amount equal to 5% of dividends received as a non-deductible expense…
SAC on proving intra-group services
In November 2017, the Regional court in České Budějovice ruled against a taxpayer in a dispute concerning the provision of services within a group. The court agreed with the tax administrator’s conclusions as to the lack of probative value of the…
Not granting personal data subject’s request is an administrative decision
The Supreme Administrative Court (SAC) dealt with the admissibility of an action for protection against unlawful infringement by an administrative body in a case where a personal data subject was not satisfied with how their request under the…